Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0885

reference
903-tree-1
name
0885
tree-preservation-order

undefined

903-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044427 50.865271)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044371 50.865265,-1.044373 50.865276,-1.044381 50.865286,-1.044394 50.865295,-1.044409 50.865300,-1.044427 50.865302,-1.044444 50.865300,-1.044460 50.865295,-1.044473 50.865287,-1.044481 50.865277,-1.044484 50.865266,-1.044482 50.865255,-1.044474 50.865245,-1.044462 50.865237,-1.044446 50.865232,-1.044428 50.865230,-1.044411 50.865231,-1.044395 50.865236,-1.044382 50.865244,-1.044374 50.865254,-1.044371 50.865265)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL